HOME WEB NEWS IMAGES CLASSIFIEDS YELLOW PAGESPOLLS - SURVEYS WIKI COUNTRIES PHOTOS US UK INDIA
Cities Stocks Weather Movies Coupons Travel Blogs Health Horoscope Maps ASIA EUROPE Classifieds Yellow Pages
|
 living trust, credit cards, elder lawwills, trusts and estates, trust | ||
|
trade leads, united states, really useful, International trade | ||
|
Birdsiworld.com bird feeder, webcamera, vets | ||
 1
|
Systemics is the emerging branch of science that studies holistic systems. It tries to develop logical, mathematical, engineering and philosophical paradigms and frameworks in which physical, technological, biological, social, cognitive and metaphysical systems can be studied and developed. Systemics can be considered an alternative name for all research related to General Systems Theory and Systems science.
Contents |
Systemics is the science of systems. It has been developed by reaction of a tendency in modern science, towards reductionist, immanentist view, according to which knowledge concerning all the parts of a whole would additively entail a complete knowledge of also that whole. Systemics draws methodic attention upon contextuallity making clear the necessity to consider the functionings of the other elements from that system, and furthermore in relation also with the systems from the environment of that system. Mioara Mugur-Schächter, Alwyn Van der Merwe (2002), Quantum Mechanics, Mathematics, Cognition and Action, 493 pp.
Systemics tends to generalize results obtained in cybernetics, classical engineering systems theory and other sciences to derive principles common to many fields, based on scientific paradigms. This inclusion of general principles characterizes the philosophy of systems. Systemics also generates many metaphysical questions, therefore, is closely related to contemporary philosophy, intelligence research and complex systems.
Charles François, editor of the International Encyclopedia of Cybernetics and Systems, in the 1990s suggested that "Systemics" be used to avoid the familiar and ambiguous terms "systems thinking," "systems science," and "general systems theory."
Systemics has two related motivations, one cognitive and one practical. The cognitive or theoretical rationale of systems is, of course, the wish to discover similarities among systems of all kind despite their specific differences - e.g. between body temperature control systems and furnace thermostats. The practical motivation for systemics is the need to cope with the huge and many-sided systems characteristics of industrial societies - such as communications, networks, factories, hospitals, and armies. This complexity, in particular the variety of components of such systems, violates the traditional borders among disciplines and calls for a cross-disciplinary approach.
Systemics and cybernetics can be viewed as a metalanguage of concepts and models for transdisciplinarian use, still now evolving and far from being stabilized. This is the result of a slow process of accretion through inclusion and interconnection of many notions, which came and are still coming from very different disciplines. The process started more than a century ago, but has gathered momentum since 1948 through the pioneering work of Norbert Wiener, John von Neumann, Ludwig von Bertalanffy, Heinz von Foerster and W. Ross Ashby, among many others. Charles François (1999), Systemics and Cybernetics in a Historical Perspective. in: Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol 16, pp.203-219.
The Argentinian-Canadian epistemologist Mario Bunge developed a very acute critical study of systemics as a scientific methodology, and in a sense philosophy. He debunked some myths concerning abusive holism, but at the same time revindicated the usefulness of systemics, especially in the fourth volume of his \'Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Ontology II. A World of Systems.
Until the 1940 every science studies systems of some kind, and every species of systems was studied separately. Since that time a number of specialists joined efforts to launch various cross-disciplinary ventures, such as operations research and cybernetics. They suggested that a unified approach to problems in various fields was possible. The discipline that purports to develop such unified approach is often called "general systems theory". Paradoxically enough, this is not a single theory but a whole set of theories - automata theory, linear systems theory, control theory, network theory, general Lagrangian dynamics, etc. - unified by a philosophical framework. Mario Bunge in 1979 proposed to call this set systemics, referring to "the set of theories that focus on the structural characteristics of systems". Mario Bunge (1979). A world of systems. Dordrecht ; Boston, Reidel.
The term Systemics is used by J.K. Feibleman in his Foundations of Empiricism (1962) to name a domain of finite ontology. Systemics was a third domain beside categorematics and axiomatics. James Kern Feibleman (1962), Foundations of Empiricism, M. Nijhoff.
In the 1990s Robert E. Young developed a systemics for learning and communication. He saw systemics as action-oriented pragmatics. Utterances are construed as meaningful deeds of special kind whose meanings are interpretively created by hearers by reference both to the words (lexicon) and structure of words (grammar) to the social situation, and to more general background knowledge of culture. This is precisely Habermas\' view. In systematics, speech and writing related context of social situation and cultural background in several ways. There is said to be a "field" relation and a "mode" relation of all meaning or messages. Robert E. Young (1996), Intercultural Communication: Pragmatics, Genealogy, Deconstruction, 214 pp.
In 2002 to Mugur-Schächter it looks though systems - the science of systems - were failing to obtain the place which it seemed to have a right to claim in the unraveling of the paradigms which define the general orientations of the various modern sciences. An element of explanation might be that, though the work developed inside the framework of systemics have produced concepts which, here and there, have been seminal, other such concepts aroused resistance.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia
